Ich hab' mal von einem gehört oder gelesen, der wollte in diesen Zeiten ein Notebook mit nvidia 8700m gt kaufen, glaube ich. Der muss diesen Text:

In terms of overall gaming performance, the graphical capabilities of the Intel HD Graphics 5500 Mobile are massively better than the Nvidia GeForce 8700M GT 256MB.The Graphics 5500 was released over three years more recently than the 8700M GT, and so the Graphics 5500 is likely to have far better driver support, meaning it will be much more optimized and ultimately superior to the 8700M GT when running the latest games. The 8700M GT has 256 MB video memory, but the Graphics 5500 does not have an entry, so the two GPUs cannot be reliably compared in this area. The HD Graphics 5500 Mobile has 24 Shader Processing Units and the GeForce 8700M GT 256MB has 32. However, the actual shader performance of the Graphics 5500 is 91 and the actual shader erformance of the 8700M GT is 20. The Graphics 5500 having 71 better shader performance and an altogether better performance when taking into account other relevant data means that the Graphics 5500 delivers a marginally smoother and more efficient experience when processing graphical data than the 8700M GT. The Graphics 5500 transistor size technology is 66 nm (nanometers) smaller than the 8700M GT. This means that the Graphics 5500 is expected to run massively cooler and achieve higher clock frequencies than the 8700M GT. The HD Graphics 5500 Mobile requires 15 Watts to run and the GeForce 8700M GT 256MB requires 29 Watts. The 8700M GT requires 14 Watts more than the Graphics 5500 to run. The difference is not significant enough for the 8700M GT to have a noticeably larger impact on your yearly electricity bills than the Graphics 5500.

irgendwie nicht gekannt haben.

Quelle: [www.game-debate.com]